- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:09:38 +0100
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
06.11.2014, 17:13, "Wayne Carr" <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>: > On 2014-11-06 03:31, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: >> š04.11.2014, 23:08, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>: >>> šHere's a rudimentary UI to make it easier for chairs and team contacts to send these review notices: >>> šššhttp://www.w3.org/2014/11/getreview/ >>> >>> šWould something like this be useful? >> šVery, but it *really* needs to cover normal Working Drafts. > > And Editor's drafts too. šIt could be a WG wants review of a new feature > in the Editor's draft that they're deciding whether to develop or not. > For instance, a WG could have sections marked experimental, that they > don't put into their TRs. šThey could want feedback on one of those in > particular and so point to the section of the Editor's draft. > > Also, reviews of proposed charters and other non-spec reviews like > requests for feedback on what new features a WG should consider would > need a different form that links to a document that isn't a spec, but is > the thing to be reviewed. Actually, you could just put "Other". You get a link to a URI, pointer to where to comment and by when, and a request for what to do. Although if you want comments in a wiki or on github, an email address isn't going to be appropriate... cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 06:10:11 UTC