- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:07:08 -0500
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 11/03/2014 07:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:10 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> > wrote: >> Since I have no idea how we got from ‘when is it required that an >> XXX review be done?’ to ‘has the W3C endorsed DRM?’ I can only >> conclude that we’re seriously at cross purposes. > > I brought up EME as an example of where vendors implemented and > shipped something that is bad for security and privacy. Reviewers > are at a loss. You said vendors should follow the W3C. I argued that > such an argument did not apply here as the W3C has not made up its > made mind (or so claims the leadership). Having recently been at a F2F with those vendors, I can confidently state that a security review prior to FPWD would not have changed vendor behavior. In fact, I see a lot of parallel to the <video> tag[1]. That being said, discussion is ongoing, and I encourage readers to consult the following: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332#c130 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#privacy-secureorigin - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2009Jun/0599.html
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 13:07:35 UTC