Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014

My true regrets for this week; I am travelling (again)

> On Nov 16, 2014, at 22:47 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> The call information for the Tuesday, 18 November, Process Document TF is
> Tuesdays 14:00-15:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local)
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference code 7762 ("PROC")
> IRC Channel: #w3process
> 
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times is:
> Pacific US
> Eastern US
> Central Europe
> Japan
> Australia
> UTC
> 7:00
> 10:00
> 16:00
> 24:00/0:00
> 1:00 + 1
> 15:00
> (with an apology to participants in Japan and Australia; a Doodle poll on a new meeting time is forthcoming.)
>  
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move toward closure.
>  
> Agenda:
> 1.      Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
> 2.      Issue-129 Remove Coordination Groups
> 3.      Issue-144: Chairs are asking for clarification for Wide Review
> See thread that begins at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0130.html  
> 4.      Issue-148: Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document
> 5.      Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process document is out of date
> See thread beginning with:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0116.html 
> which has the discussion of the text Chaals proposed for Section 2.2
> And if time is available:
> 6.      Issue-97: Is using the term "Board" in "Advisory Board" really accurate and representative?
> 7.      Any other business
>  
> For reference, The current editors draft of the Process Document [1].
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html
>  
> Steve Zilles

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 22:35:42 UTC