Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management

Stephen Zilles wrote:
> A Working Group should keep their Recommendations up-to-date as errors
are reported by readers and implementers.
> Such error reports should be processed no less frequently than quarterly
and errata should be placed in the Recommendation.

Probably worth noting that things which are determined to not be errata
don't have to go into the document (unless clarification is helpful) ...

"As applicable" comes to mind
"If it is valid"

> An erratum is resolved by an informative,
> “proposed” correction generated by the Working Group  A correction
becomes a normative part of the

You're missing punctuation between "Working Group" and "A".

> Recommendation by the process for Revising a Recommendation described in
the next section.

Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 06:22:31 UTC