- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 23:22:04 -0700
- To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 06:22:31 UTC
Stephen Zilles wrote: > A Working Group should keep their Recommendations up-to-date as errors are reported by readers and implementers. > Such error reports should be processed no less frequently than quarterly and errata should be placed in the Recommendation. Probably worth noting that things which are determined to not be errata don't have to go into the document (unless clarification is helpful) ... "As applicable" comes to mind Possibly "If it is valid" > An erratum is resolved by an informative, > “proposed” correction generated by the Working Group A correction becomes a normative part of the You're missing punctuation between "Working Group" and "A". > Recommendation by the process for Revising a Recommendation described in the next section.
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 06:22:31 UTC