Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 11 November, 2014

My apologies

I didn’t see the agenda before finishing work for the day monday, and only now after the meeting.  Could it be sent out a little earlier, please?

thanks

On Nov 10, 2014, at 20:12 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:

> The call information for the Tuesday, 11 November, Process Document TF is
> Tuesdays 14:00-15:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local)
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference code 7762 ("PROC")
> IRC Channel: #w3process
> 
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times is:
> Pacific US
> Eastern US
> Central Europe
> Japan
> Australia
> UTC
> 7:00
> 10:00
> 16:00
> 24:00/0:00
> 1:00 + 1
> 15:00
>  
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move toward closure.
>  
> Agenda:
> 1.      Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
> 2.      Discuss Meeting time
> This Telcon now begins at Midnight in Japan and at 1AM in Australia. Possible other time include:
> 
> Pacific US
> Eastern US
> Central Europe
> Japan
> Australia
> UTC
> 13:00
> 14:00
> 16:00
> 17:00
> 22:00
> 23:00
> 6:00 + 1
> 7:00 + 1
> 7:00 + 1
> 8:00 + 1
> 21:00
> 22:00
>  
> 3.      Issue-141: Improve Errata management in W3C
> Proposed replacement text for section 7.7.1 was sent:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0004.html
> and Proposal and associated discussion thread begins at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Oct/0139.html
> Charles has an Action: Propose a resolution for issue 141 to propose an alternative replacement text.
> 4.      Issue-129 Remove Coordination Groups
> 5.      Issue-144: Chairs are asking for clarification for Wide Review
> The Document Review wiki has been edited to resolve concerns expressed so efforts to create an RfC announcement list should proceed. Some editing of the text of the Wide Review section, to indicate the desired purposes of the changes to Wide Review, is still needed.
> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/29-widereview-minutes.html
> See thread announcing the results of the CfC:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Oct/0157.html
> 6.      Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process document is out of date
> We seem to be reaching consensus on not listing rights and responsibilities of the Director in 2.2. We have not, however, reached consensus on whether the Process Document should have or point to a definition of the W3C. There are two points that have been raised: (a) The legal status of the W3C does not need to be discussed in the Process and (b) the term “W3C” is used in the Process Document and should have a definition within that document, but, perhaps, it a separate section rather than part of section 2.2.
> And if time is available:
> 7.      Issue-138: Does the process assume ‘an’ editor, or is group-editing formally ok?
> 8.      Issue-97: Is using the term "Board" in "Advisory Board" really accurate and representative?
> 9.      Any other business
>  
> For reference, The current editors draft of the Process Document [1].
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html
>  
> Steve Zilles

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 16:48:53 UTC