Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014

Steve,

A candidate AOB is a resolution passed by the AB in its meeting yesterday.

*RESOLUTION: AB input to W3C process CG is that the modification to 
election procedures that in the case of a change of affiliation instead 
of requiring immediate resignation, we should allow the people to serve 
until the next regular election*

Jeff

On 11/17/2014 1:01 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
> The call information for the Tuesday, 18 November, Process Document TF is
>
> Tuesdays14:00-15:00 UTC 
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=26&year=2014&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0>(10:00am-11:00am 
> Boston local)
> Zakim Bridge+1.617.761.6200 <tel:+1.617.761.6200>, conference code 
> 7762 ("PROC")
> IRC Channel: #w3process
>
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times is:
>
> Pacific US
>
> 	
>
> Eastern US
>
> 	
>
> Central Europe
>
> 	
>
> Japan
>
> 	
>
> Australia
>
> 	
>
> UTC
>
> 7:00
>
> 	
>
> 10:00
>
> 	
>
> 16:00
>
> 	
>
> 24:00/0:00
>
> 	
>
> 1:00 + 1
>
> 	
>
> 15:00
>
> (with an apology to participants in Japan and Australia; a Doodle poll 
> on a new meeting time is forthcoming.)
>
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of 
> open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move 
> toward closure.
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1.Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
>
> 2.Issue-129 Remove Coordination Groups 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/129>
>
> 3.Issue-144: Chairs are asking for clarification for Wide Review 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/144>
>
> See thread that begins at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0130.html
>
> 4.Issue-148: Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC 
> Track document <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/148>
>
> 5.Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process 
> document is out of date 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/140>
> See thread beginning with:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0116.html
> which has the discussion of the text Chaals proposed for Section 2.2
>
> And if time is available:
>
> 6.Issue-97: Is using the term "Board" in "Advisory Board" really 
> accurate and representative? 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/97>
>
> 7.Any other business
>
> For reference, The current editors draft of the Process Document [1].
>
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html 
> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html>
>
> Steve Zilles
>