Friday, 28 November 2014
- Re: Extension to 3 December Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-146
- Re: w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
- Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods
- RE: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods
- Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods
- Extension to 3 December Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-146
- Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods
- Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-146
- Re: w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
- Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods
- CfC: Close ISSUE-146
- Re: w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
- w3process-ISSUE-149 (no-delegation): Are there things the director should not be able to delegate? [Process Document]
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- RE: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- RE: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- RE: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal and the discussion of Issue-141
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- w3process-ACTION-43: Will confirm that all musts about the team would be covered by delegating from director
- Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules; Respond by December 8, 2014
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules; Respond by December 8, 2014
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups
- ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules; Respond by December 8, 2014
- RE: Issue-129 Coordination Groups
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups
Monday, 24 November 2014
- Issue-129 Coordination Groups
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014
Sunday, 23 November 2014
Saturday, 22 November 2014
Friday, 21 November 2014
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
Thursday, 20 November 2014
- WHATWG/W3C collaboration proposal
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-148 (Consider Liaisons): Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document [Process Document]
Wednesday, 19 November 2014
- Update on the Process Document Task Force
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-148 (Consider Liaisons): Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document [Process Document]
Tuesday, 18 November 2014
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-148 (Consider Liaisons): Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document [Process Document]
- Re: Issue-144 Suggested updates to clarify Wide Review in Process2014
- w3process-ACTION-42: Send cfc on text proposed to fix the election process when a change of affliliation occurs
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
Monday, 17 November 2014
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
- RE: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
- RE: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014
- Re: Issue-144 Suggested updates to clarify Wide Review in Process2014
- w3process-ISSUE-148 (Consider Liaisons): Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document [Process Document]
- RE: Issue-144 Suggested updates to clarify Wide Review in Process2014
Sunday, 16 November 2014
Saturday, 15 November 2014
Friday, 14 November 2014
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: ISSUE-129 - coordination groups
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- ISSUE-129 - coordination groups
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
Thursday, 13 November 2014
- Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
- Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
Wednesday, 12 November 2014
- Re: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Re: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Re: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Re: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Re: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- RE: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
Tuesday, 11 November 2014
- RE: Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 11 November, 2014
- Action Items for Process
- w3process-ACTION-41: Propose text for the intent of the wide review section and to add liaisons to list of director considerations
- w3process-ACTION-40: Look at simplifying coordination groups to meet judy's needs
- w3process-ACTION-39: Talk to judy about using an existing group type, for example, member-only ig, to coordinate wai activity
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements
Monday, 10 November 2014
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- RE: Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements
- Proposed list for all First/Final CG report announcements
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- List created [Was: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- RE: Require security review before FPWD
Sunday, 9 November 2014
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
Friday, 7 November 2014
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
- Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]
Thursday, 6 November 2014
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
Wednesday, 5 November 2014
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-146 (cepc-does-not-override-local-laws): state the obvious: the policy does not and cannot override local laws and regulations, particularly those regarding employment [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-147 (cepc-facilitate-collaborative-evolution): Put the CEPC document in a system that facilitates change requests and evolution of the document [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- FW: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- w3process-ISSUE-147 (cepc-facilitate-collaborative-evolution): Put the CEPC document in a system that facilitates change requests and evolution of the document [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]
- w3process-ISSUE-146 (cepc-does-not-override-local-laws): state the obvious: the policy does not and cannot override local laws and regulations, particularly those regarding employment [Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct]
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
- UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]
- RE: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- RE: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- w3process-ACTION-38: Propose a resolution for issue 141
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
Monday, 3 November 2014
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- RE: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- proposed spec accessibility review questionnaire [first pass]
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
Sunday, 2 November 2014
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- New list: W3C synchonization and consistency [Was: AB priorities 2014/2015]
- New list: Identify most important priorities for Web & W3C [Was: AB priorities, 2014/2015]
- New list: "Identify work not destined for success" [Was: AB priorities, 2014/2015]
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Require security review before FPWD
- Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
- Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
- Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules
- Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management
- RE: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules