Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014

Anticipate being a little late.  I have a conflict which hopefully ends 
at 10:15 ET.

Jeff

On 11/24/2014 12:16 AM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
> The call is on Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 at 14:00-15:00 UTC 
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=26&year=2014&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0>(10:00am-11:00am 
> Boston local)
> Zakim Bridge+1.617.761.6200 <tel:+1.617.761.6200>, conference code 
> 7762 ("PROC")
> IRC Channel: #w3process
>
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times were:
>
> Pacific:  7:00
>
> Eastern US: 10:00
>
> Central Europe: 16:00
>
> Japan: 24:00/0:00 +1
>
> Australia: 1:00 + 1
>
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of 
> open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move 
> toward closure.
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1.Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
>
> 2.Issue-129 Remove Coordination Groups 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/129>
> Discussion with Judy Brewer
> Should the Process Document include a discussion of "coordination" 
> (and an escalation path when it does not occur)?
>
> 3.Issue-140: The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process 
> document is out of date 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/140>
> See thread beginning with:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0116.html
> which has the discussion of the text Chaals proposed for Section 2.2
>
> The open topic is doing the updates to other sections that are implied 
> by the removal of text from section 2.2.
> And, the issue of delegation of the CEO's responsibilities, those 
> previously given to the COO and Chair.
>
> 4.Issue-144: Chairs are asking for clarification for Wide Review 
> <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/144>
> >From 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0130.html
>
> Item 3. Change the initial phrase of the second sentence of the 
> paragraph, "the Director will consider who has been explicitly offered 
> a reasonable opportunity to review the document," to "the Director 
> will consider who has been explicitly offered a reasonable opportunity 
> to review the document, when those offers were made,"
>
> Steve Zilles
>
> Chair, Process Document Task Force
>