- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:02:32 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
On Nov 3, 2014, at 15:22 , Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Requiring all documents between FPWD and CR to include a status of various reviews would indeed be a good thing. Doing so would reinforce the message that such activities be done early without unduly slowing down the process. > > I don't think that this should be limited to security. PLH listed[1] a few other areas that should be considered. Nor me. I actually think privacy is at least as much, if not more of, a nightmare for the W3C. Accessibility, i18n are two others that come to mind. > >> David Singer >> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Oct/0205.html David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 16:03:14 UTC