- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:50:01 -0500
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 11/25/2014 08:05 PM, Wayne Carr wrote: > > On 2014-11-25 13:47, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> In fact, there are known ways to compensate for this. Such ways >> generally involve the creation of a stabilizing branch and removing >> features that aren't quite ready for prime time in that branch. Such >> efforts are short duration, and produce a reference-able snapshot. > > Instead of a stabilizing branch where separate work is done to get to > it, couldn't non-stable, non-widely implemented sections be marked as > one of the categories you mention above in the main document? so a > snapshot is automatic - it just removes the sections that aren't mature. > (so no separate "stabilizing" work - it's part of the main spec - or at > most pointing out where the labels aren't set correctly. So new > experimental stuff is clearly marked as new experimental stuff.) Definitely worth exploring. Search for "bug" here for an example: https://specs.webplatform.org/url/webspecs/develop/#file-url I don't believe "file:" URLs can be removed entirely. Suggestions welcome. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 02:50:30 UTC