Wednesday, 28 February 2007
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- [SKOS] NASA taxonomies
- Re: [RDFa] public access to CURIEs work
- Re: [RDFa] public access to CURIEs work
- [RDFa] public access to CURIEs work
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27)
- Re: AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Regrets for 6th March
- Re: Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27)
- Comments on the latest snapshot of the primer (2007-02-27)
- AW: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- SKOS & FOAF mystery solved (pretty much)
Tuesday, 27 February 2007
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: ISSUE-27: Annotations on Labels
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- Re: [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- terms as classes: the WordNet example
- Re: ISSUE-27: Annotations on Labels
- Re: SKOS and FOAF
- ISSUE-27: Annotations on Labels
- Re: action: proposal for aligning IssuesProcess and Tracker
- AW: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [RDFa] Response to Reviewer Comments on RDFa Primer
- [ALL] Meeting in June?
- Re: action: proposal for aligning IssuesProcess and Tracker
- action: proposal for aligning IssuesProcess and Tracker
- Re: [RDFa, ALL] Ranges of Dublin Core properties and RDFa
- Re: tracker 'states' proposal
- Re: [RDFa] FOAF this!
- Re: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- [RDFa] FOAF this!
- Re: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: tracker 'states' proposal
- Re: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: tracker 'states' proposal
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- Re: [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [SKOS] Possible issue: Uniqueness of skos:prefLabel [was Re: [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: RelationshipBetweenLabels
- [SKOS] inconsistency between Guide and Specification
- Re: SKOS and FOAF
Monday, 26 February 2007
- Re: SKOS and FOAF
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- Re: SKOS and FOAF
- SKOS and FOAF
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-27 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [RDFa, ALL] Ranges of Dublin Core properties and RDFa
- RE: [ALL] Scribe duty on SWD telecons
- [ALL] Scribe duty on SWD telecons
Saturday, 24 February 2007
Friday, 23 February 2007
Thursday, 22 February 2007
Wednesday, 21 February 2007
- SKOS
- [RDFa] RDFa in XHTML 1
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] relationships between labels
- AW: Agenda - 2007-02-20 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
Tuesday, 20 February 2007
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress
- RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- RE: [RDFa] Test Suite progress
- RE: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: tracker 'states' proposal
- [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility
- tracker 'states' proposal
- [SKOS] version history web site error
- Re: [SKOS] Editing SKOS issues
- ISSUE-26: RelationshipsBetweenLabels
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: [kweb-all] Vocabulary maintenance: WP 2.3 and W3C Semantic Web Deployment
- Re: [SKOS] relationships between labels
- Vocabulary maintenance: WP 2.3 and W3C Semantic Web Deployment
- Re: [RDFa] Test Suite progress
- ACTION SKOS specialization
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- [RDFa] Test Suite progress
- Re: Agenda - 2007-02-20 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!
- Re: Agenda - 2007-02-20 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
Monday, 19 February 2007
- Regrets (was: RE: Agenda - 2007-02-20 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC)
- Agenda - 2007-02-20 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- [SKOS] relationships between labels
Sunday, 18 February 2007
Saturday, 17 February 2007
- RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
Friday, 16 February 2007
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- RE: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- [RDFa] rdf:XMLLiteral (was RE: Missing issue on the list: identification of RDFa content)
- ISSUE-25: Default Datatype (rdf:XMLLiteral)
- Re: [SKOS] about annotation on annotations
Thursday, 15 February 2007
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: RDFa in 10sec
- Collection of explanations at ESW Wiki (was: RE: RDFa in 10sec)
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: RDFa in 10sec
- Re: RDFa in 10sec
- RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: RDFa in 10sec
Wednesday, 14 February 2007
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- RDFa in 10sec
- ISSUE-24: Additional text explaining redirect choices in the recipes
- ISSUE-23: There should be some discussion of alternatives to .htaccess
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- ISSUE-22: Questioning reference to IE6 hack
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- ISSUE-21: Apache configuration should add that mod_rewrite must be loaded and enabled
- ISSUE-20: Online server testing
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- RE: [RDFa] Overview
- Re: [SKOS] thesaurus USE patterns
- Re: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
Tuesday, 13 February 2007
- [RDFa] new telecon code starting 26 Feb
- RE: [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- RE: RDFa Schedule
- [ALL] meeting record: 2007-02-13 SWD telecon
- [RDFa] The CLASS attribute
- RDFa Schedule
- Re: [RDFa] Overview
- Re: [SKOS] Cases for coordination
- ISSUE-19: Recipes should supply a general server configuration template
- ISSUE-18: QA Review comments from Karl Dubost
- ISSUE-17: Recipe 6 is incomplete
- ISSUE-16: Default behavior
- ISSUE-15: Extended configuration
- Re: [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question)
- [SKOS] Cases for coordination
- ISSUE-14: Apache configuration
- regrets
- RE: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-13 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- Regrets for today's telecon
- [RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question)
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-13 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- regrets for today's telecon
- [Recipes] Issue: IE6 hack
- Regrets for 13/2 Telecon
- Re: [SKOS] about annotation on annotations
- Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question
- Re: [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents
Monday, 12 February 2007
- Re: [SKOS] about annotation on annotations
- Re: [SKOS] Re: more SKOS requirements
- [SKOS] about annotation on annotations
- [SKOS] Re: more SKOS requirements
- [ALL] Agenda - 2007-02-13 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
- Regrets for tcon Tues
Sunday, 11 February 2007
- [RDFa] an XHTML Module for RDFa
- Re: more SKOS requirements
- Re: [SKOS] semantics
- Re: [SKOS] semantics
Saturday, 10 February 2007
Friday, 9 February 2007
- RE: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question
- Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question
- Re: [SKOS] thesaurus USE patterns
- [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question
Thursday, 8 February 2007
- [RDFa] Terminology Proposal
- regrets for 13 Feb
- Re: [SKOS] thesaurus USE patterns
- [SKOS] thesaurus USE patterns
- [SKOS] semantics
- [RDFa] Some QA-related issues regarding RDFa documents
Wednesday, 7 February 2007
- Re: [SKOS] languages and scripts
- ISSUE-13: Closed Issues as of 2007-01-31
- Re: [SKOS] languages and scripts
- Debugging Semantic Web sites with cURL
- Re: [ALL] SWD scribing duties
- Re: [ALL] SWD scribing duties
- [Fwd: Zakim direct call numbers from the UK and from France]
- Re: [ALL] SWD scribing duties
- [ALL] SWD scribing duties
Tuesday, 6 February 2007
- Re: [SKOS] languages and scripts
- [RDFa] Relationship between RDFa and GRDDL
- Re: [SKOS] languages and scripts
- [SKOS] deliverables
- Re: [ALL] agenda 6 Feb telecon 1600 UTC
- RE: [SKOS] New web site rolled out
- [RDFa] meeting record: 2007-02-5 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
Monday, 5 February 2007
- Re: [SKOS] New web site rolled out
- Re: [ALL] agenda 6 Feb telecon 1600 UTC
- RE: [SKOS] New web site rolled out
- [SKOS] languages and scripts
- Re: [ALL] agenda 6 Feb telecon 1600 UTC
- ISSUE-12: RDFa Syntax document does not include the nested METAs use case scenario
- Re: [ALL] agenda 6 Feb telecon 1600 UTC
- [ALL] agenda 6 Feb telecon 1600 UTC
- RE: [RDFa] Testcases