Re: tracker 'states' proposal

Hi,

>
> Ralph,
>
> re: "> I might also expect that
>
>> son-of-tracker might permit some individual customization
>> by each WG but the intent would be to have a base vocabulary
>> that is common to all WGs."
>
>
> I obviously hesitated quite a bit before saying this, but...
>
> This looks to me like an excellent use case for a machine-readable 
> thesaurus.
>
> In my experience this type of requirement pops up fairly frequently in
> software design. Even if we don't formalize this as a SKOS use case
> (too late isn't it?),

Well if you've got time you can still give it a try ;-)
The problem would be to find place in the document for it. But we can 
still put it on the wiki, and point to it from the document....

Cheers,

Antoine

Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 13:47:20 UTC