Re: [SKOS] Editing SKOS issues

Hi,

I knew I had raised the issue before ;-)

So whatever happens regarding the final process, here is the only help I 
can be of: marking the issues on the sandbox as 'transfered' to the tracker.
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox#head-59f7ae39eaea52b9f942d28207246078e1fb3a01

Cheers,

Antoine

>
> Hi,
>
> As Guus pointed, there is no use keeping confidential a mail I wrote 
> with question about the edition process for SKOS issues, trying to 
> make things clearer. Perhaps we can discuss that during next teleconf...
>
> Following our teleconf yesterday, this mail tries to clarify the 
> situation about who does what for the issue list(s):
> 1. Alistair is the official editor on 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables
> 2. Jon has to decide on whether the wiki shall be used for issues 
> (empty http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues) or if we use the 
> tracker.
> 3. To guide our early discussion I have put (and updated) on 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox a list of current 
> issues that is unedited (the only interests being that (i) it's a list 
> of our current issues and (ii) they are linked to the requirements)
>
> Some synchronization has therefore to be done. Honnestly I'll be glad 
> to let Jon and Alistair deal with further editing of the issue list. 
> As long as their plans involve keeping the links between the issues 
> and the requirements, which I think are really necessary, I'm happy!
> So gentlemen, I'll let you decide. But I think that it is better if 
> for the issue edition we have only one person in charge. It's not a 
> big problem, synchronization can always be difficult, and it is highly 
> possible that some of us will also have to deal soon with other tasks, 
> e.g. SKOS test cases...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 17:07:05 UTC