- From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:43:38 -0800
- To: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>,SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Alistair, I like this document--this is getting to important issues. With respect to SKOS lexical labelling properties, I believe these should be typed as annotation properties. Is there any consensus on this issue? Daniel At 10:29 AM 2/20/2007, Alistair Miles wrote: >Hi all, > >I tried to illustrate some of the issues relating to SKOS and OWL DL >compatibility, see: > >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/OwlCompatibility?action=recall&rev=7 > >ACTION: Alistair to rephrase the old issue of skos/owl-dl >coexistence and semantics [recorded in >http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action08] >--done > >Cheers, > >Alistair. > >-- >Alistair Miles >Research Associate >CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >Building R1 Room 1.60 >Fermi Avenue >Chilton >Didcot >Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >United Kingdom >Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman >Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 01:43:52 UTC