W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [SKOS] OWL DL compatibility

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:57:22 +0100
Message-ID: <45DC2592.8080602@mondeca.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>

Hi all
> I'm still digesting the issue. But one immediate point: I am 
> uncomfortable with excessive use of OWL's notion of "annotation 
> properties". They're very much 2nd-class citizens in the OWL world. 
> I'd rather define extra properties for class etc annotation, and 
> restrict prefLabel, altLabel to SKOS individuals.
The first objective IMO is to be able to integrate SKOS instances in an 
OWL-DL framework. Using the SKOS vocabulary to label OWL elements is of 
course appealing, but potentially confusing, and I'm not sure it's such 
a good idea. OWL-DL has deliberately sacrified the linguistic aspects of 
naming on the autel of logic, by putting NL labels and languages outside 
the semantics. I think we (SKOS) should not mess up with that, or try to 
patch that bug of OWL-DL which is actually a deliberate built-in feature 
But both OWL and SKOS should be clear on this. Want logic, rules, 
inference, go the OWL-DL way but forget about dealing with the 
linguistic aspects (or build your own ad hoc classes and properties). In 
SKOS you'll have linguistic aspects in the semantics (hopefully at the 
end of the day).



*Bernard Vatant
*Knowledge Engineering
*3, citÚ Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
Tel:       +33 (0) 871 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Blog:    Lešons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 10:57:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:41 UTC