- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:06:19 +0100
- To: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
All,
Based on [1] I would like to raise some issues regarding our
RDFa documents [2]. This is done, at least for now, from the
point of view of the RDFa Test Suite; might be valid in general
as well ...
1. Regarding section '2.2.2 What needs to conform?' in [1]:
Do we address this requirement? In this context it might help to
specify the 'products'.
Does it help here to propose a division in REST-style extractor,
and DOM-operating extractor? Did we even define how we call the
'XHTML+RDFa -> RDF' service, anyway? Is it a transformation, an
extraction, etc. ?
2. Regarding section '2.3.2 What is mandatory?' in [1]:
Though I found two occurrences of 'must' in the RDFa syntax document
[3],
I am not sure if we already make use of the RFC 2119 [4] keywords in
a
sensible way.
3. Regarding section '2.4.5 Error Handling' in [1]:
Do we need to specify an error handling mechanism? Though it might
be a bit of an overkill and this is not a strict requirement, but
rather
a good practice, we might want to contemplate on this one as well.
I admit that all of this might seem to be a bit early, but again, in the
light of setting up the RDFa Test Suite, some of these and other related
issues bother me :)
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_documents
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/
[4] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
<office>
phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
<private>
mobile: +43-660-7621761
web: http://www.sw-app.org/
----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:06:44 UTC