Re: [SKOS] about annotation on annotations

Hello Daniel,

>>
>>
>>> [PENDING] ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation 
>>> requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal 
>>> values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
>>>
>>> [PENDING] ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue 
>>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01]
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you think that the "externallySourcedDefinition" in [1] matches 
>> that kind of annotation?
>
>
> not really a good match to "preferredLabel"

Agreed, but it was registered like that in the minutes, and we don't 
have authority for the issue list now :-(

>
>> In the example you give there :
>>
>>> Class:                                 Fear
>>> birn_annot:birnlexExternalSource       UMLS
>>> obo_annot:externallySourcedDefinition  Unpleasant but normal 
>>> emotional response to genuine external danger or 
>>> threats;                                       compare with ANXIETY 
>>> and CLINICAL ANXIETY. (CSP)
>>> obo_annot:externallySourcedDefinition  The affective response to an 
>>> actual current external danger which subsides 
>>> with                                       the elimination of the 
>>> threatening condition. (MeSH)
>>
>> you might want to assert explicitly in SKOS/RDF that the MESH 
>> definition you take as a reference comes from the MESH concept scheme 
>> (e.g. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/conceptscheme)...
>
>
> Specifically, you might want to assert in SKOS that the definition 
> comes from the MeSH terminology (btw--your link above doesn't work).

I emphasize the *in SKOS* of your answer. So the example is linked to 
the issue. Thanks for the answer! (an that's funny the link works, today)

Cheers,

Antoine

>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/EucBirnLexDetailed
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 08:46:23 UTC