- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:46:21 +0100
- To: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hello Daniel, >> >> >>> [PENDING] ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation >>> requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal >>> values, and how to represent that in skos [recorded in >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] >>> >>> [PENDING] ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue >>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] >> >> >> >> Do you think that the "externallySourcedDefinition" in [1] matches >> that kind of annotation? > > > not really a good match to "preferredLabel" Agreed, but it was registered like that in the minutes, and we don't have authority for the issue list now :-( > >> In the example you give there : >> >>> Class: Fear >>> birn_annot:birnlexExternalSource UMLS >>> obo_annot:externallySourcedDefinition Unpleasant but normal >>> emotional response to genuine external danger or >>> threats; compare with ANXIETY >>> and CLINICAL ANXIETY. (CSP) >>> obo_annot:externallySourcedDefinition The affective response to an >>> actual current external danger which subsides >>> with the elimination of the >>> threatening condition. (MeSH) >> >> you might want to assert explicitly in SKOS/RDF that the MESH >> definition you take as a reference comes from the MESH concept scheme >> (e.g. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/conceptscheme)... > > > Specifically, you might want to assert in SKOS that the definition > comes from the MeSH terminology (btw--your link above doesn't work). I emphasize the *in SKOS* of your answer. So the example is linked to the issue. Thanks for the answer! (an that's funny the link works, today) Cheers, Antoine >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/EucBirnLexDetailed > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 08:46:23 UTC