- From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:49:41 -0800
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>,public-swd-wg@w3.org
At 08:52 AM 2/27/2007, SWD Issue Tracker wrote: >ISSUE-27: Annotations on Labels > >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/27 > >Raised by: Guus Schreiber >On product: SKOS > >Labels which are currently modeled as literals in SKOS, as well as possibly >other literals, are valid subjects of discourse when modeling concept schemes, >e.g. when recording the dates during which a particular label was in >common use. >However, in RDF, only resources may be subjects of statements, and >literals may >only be objects of statements. The question then arises, how are we >to annotate >(i.e. relate, as subject) labels and other literals to other entities. Labels should be resources so that they can be the subjects of statements. In general, anything that is a valid subject of discourse and that may participate in a relationship to other subjects of discourse should be resources (conceptually, such things are really classes). If labels are modeled as resources, then we can annotate labels to other entities. >Issue sandbox: >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/CandidateReqList#head-4093aa50c2c3c22df13dd0278bd8d0290ca93e2d > >Related: >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/AnnotationPatterns
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:49:51 UTC