- From: Jan Henke <jan.henke@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:54:29 +0100
- To: "'SWD WG'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, my name is Jan. I work at DERI Innsbruck. As I'm new to this group, please allow me some stupid questions :-) Do I get it right that a skos:Concept specializes an owl:Class in a way that it is only about *abstract* things? Hereby both the abstract and the non-abstract entities shall be allowed to have different types of labels, right? Having arrived at this point I was wondering: Why not adopt the structure proposed within PROTON [1] where we have owl:Thing Entity Abstract GeneralTerm Happening Object LexicalResource Mention WeightedTerm Alias with each entity having the property hasAlias:Alias. I think in here a GeneralTerm is exactly what in SKOS is called Concept. Am I wrong at this point? Assuming this to be true, both abstract and non-abstract entities would have a pointer to a LexicalResource, i.e. some sort of label which is what we want, right? What do you think? Best regards Jan [1] http://proton.semanticweb.org/ ---------------------------------------------- E-Mail: jan.henke@deri.org Address: Digital Enterprise Research Institute Leopold Franzens University Technikerstraße 21a 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria Phone: +43 512 507 6451 ----------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 13:54:38 UTC