- From: Jan Henke <jan.henke@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:54:29 +0100
- To: "'SWD WG'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,
my name is Jan. I work at DERI Innsbruck. As I'm new to this group, please
allow me some stupid questions :-)
Do I get it right that a skos:Concept specializes an owl:Class in a way that
it is only about *abstract* things?
Hereby both the abstract and the non-abstract entities shall be allowed to
have different types of labels, right?
Having arrived at this point I was wondering: Why not adopt the structure
proposed within PROTON [1] where we have
owl:Thing
Entity
Abstract
GeneralTerm
Happening
Object
LexicalResource
Mention
WeightedTerm
Alias
with each entity having the property hasAlias:Alias. I think in here a
GeneralTerm is exactly what in SKOS is called Concept. Am I wrong at this
point? Assuming this to be true, both abstract and non-abstract entities
would have a pointer to a LexicalResource, i.e. some sort of label which is
what we want, right?
What do you think?
Best regards
Jan
[1] http://proton.semanticweb.org/
----------------------------------------------
E-Mail: jan.henke@deri.org
Address: Digital Enterprise Research Institute
Leopold Franzens University
Technikerstraße 21a
6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
Phone: +43 512 507 6451
----------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 13:54:38 UTC