Re: more SKOS requirements

Hi Daniel,

>
>
> A few of the communities I've been working with for SKOS use cases 
> have come together to identify a set of metadata elements they need to 
> be associated with terms in their published terminologies. I feel 
> these should be considered for additional SKOS requirements.

The metadata elements you give are indeed now considered (at least the 
general categories they belong to) in the candidate requirement list, or 
in the issue list.
But of course the items there need further definition. Alan has accepted 
to do some investigation on this:

> ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation requirements, in 
> particular to those that are related to literal values, and how to 
> represent that in skos [recorded in 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]
> ACTION: Alan write up the preferredLabel modelling issue [recorded in 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] 


I think definitively you should collaborate together on that! Your OBI 
list is a good input. By the way, I think it should appear explicitly in 
the corresponding case description, shouldn't it?

Thanks for your input,

Antoine

> Thanks
> Daniel
>
>
> Here is a list of metadata properties and definitions:
> http://obi.sourceforge.net/ontologyInformation/MinimalMetadata.html
>
> This list was compiled over the last months, starting from the
> RU_metadata.owl, the BirnLex metadata requirements and the metadata
> annotations provided by the NCIT (all of which can be found on the
> OBI-Wiki at
> https://www.cbil.upenn.edu/fugowiki/index.php/RepresentationalUnitMetadataTable). 
>
> This minimal subset of metadata properties was agreed upon, and had its
> definitions finalized by the OBI metadata subgroup during the last two
> weeks.
> The added cardinalities are still under discussion, as is the
> implementation and in some cases the domain of the metadata properties.
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 10 February 2007 18:30:40 UTC