public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from February 2011 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Monday, 7 February)

Benjamin Adrian

• Re: Telecon Agenda - February 10th 2011, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 10 February)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) (Friday, 4 February)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Removal of empty div/spans in Firefox (re: ISSUE-67 was: Re: Golly gosh!) (Thursday, 3 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib (Saturday, 26 February)
• terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib (Thursday, 24 February)
• 'registering' other formats? (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Please get your AC rep to vote (Monday, 21 February)
• Please get your AC rep to vote (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni (Saturday, 19 February)
• Default profile files installed (Friday, 18 February)
• FYI: renewed RDFa Charter (Thursday, 17 February)
• Last Call comment (ISSUE-77) : default blank node generation in the header (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Profile URI-s (Monday, 14 February)
• prefixes for the default rdfa profile (related to ACTION-62 ) (Friday, 11 February)
• Profile URI-s (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Proposal about xmlns (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83: CURIEs must require colon (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Official response to your LC comment (recorded as ISSUE-69) (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Monday, 7 February)
• Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) (Saturday, 5 February)
• Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) (Friday, 4 February)
• Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) (Friday, 4 February)
• Updated the document for the term/prefix vocabulary (ACTION-57) (Friday, 4 February)
• Backward compatibility v.a.v. terms in the charter (ACTION-58) (Friday, 4 February)
• Processor Graph Vocabulary ( relevant to ACTION-52 and ISSUE-67 ) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Golly gosh! (Wednesday, 2 February)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Telecon Agenda - March 3rd 2011, 1400 UTC (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: A mnemonic for learning RDFa : APRIL (Sunday, 27 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-24 (Thursday, 24 February)
• HTML WG ISSUE-120 - Counter Arguments (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Telecon Agenda - February 24th 2011, 1400 UTC (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments (Monday, 21 February)
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring (Sunday, 20 February)
• RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring (Sunday, 20 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-17 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Telecon Agenda - February 17th 2011, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 17 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-14 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Profile URI-s (Monday, 14 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-10 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Proposal about xmlns (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83: CURIEs must require colon (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Telecon Agenda - February 10th 2011, 1400 UTC (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Preparing Official LC Responses (Sunday, 6 February)
• Last Call response for ISSUE-71: LC Comments from Shelley Powers (Sunday, 6 February)
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-63: Case-insensitive term matching (Sunday, 6 February)
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-46: Conversion of Plain Literals to IRIs (Sunday, 6 February)
• Heads up - Distributed Extensibility is dead in HTML5 (Friday, 4 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February)
• Removal of empty div/spans in Firefox (re: ISSUE-67 was: Re: Golly gosh!) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• CORRECTION: Re: Telecon Agenda - February 3rd 2011, 1500 UTC (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Telecon Agenda - February 4th 2011, 1400 UTC (Wednesday, 2 February)
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-01 (Tuesday, 1 February)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: Telecon Agenda - February 17th 2011, 1400 UTC (Thursday, 17 February)

Melvin Carvalho

• A mnemonic for learning RDFa : APRIL (Sunday, 27 February)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: ISSUE-65: Michael Hausenblas' editorial comments (was Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1) (Monday, 14 February)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: Golly gosh! (Wednesday, 2 February)

Nathan

• Re: terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Thursday, 10 February)
• Proposal about xmlns (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83: CURIEs must require colon (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• about:blank and schemes w/ CURIEs (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term (Monday, 7 February)
• Proposal, allow Colon in a Term (Monday, 7 February)
• RDFa Default Profile Management (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: TERMorCURIEorAbsURIs definition problem (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Sunday, 6 February)
• TERMorCURIEorAbsURIs definition problem (Saturday, 5 February)
• Problem(s) .. Prefix, colon, CURIE and term (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: Heads up - Distributed Extensibility is dead in HTML5 (Friday, 4 February)
• [Fwd: RE: Short briefing/background doc't regarding RDFa, prefixes and HTML] (Thursday, 3 February)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Golly gosh! (Wednesday, 2 February)

RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-86 (prefixes and terms): Determine if prefixes and terms can be collapsed into one concept in the RDFa API [RDF API] (Monday, 28 February)
• ISSUE-85 (projections and property groups): Determine whether both Projections and PropertyGroups are necessary [RDFa 1.1 API] (Monday, 28 February)
• ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Tuesday, 8 February)
• ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Saturday, 5 February)
• ISSUE-82: Can RDFa attributes be namespaced? (Thursday, 3 February)

Sebastian Heath

• Re: Proposal about xmlns (Thursday, 10 February)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management (Sunday, 27 February)
• Re: Please get your AC rep to vote (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni (Saturday, 19 February)
• Re: ISSUE-70: Formal Response (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-67 triage (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni (Friday, 18 February)
• ISSUE-70: Formal Response (Friday, 18 February)
• ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Monday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-65: Michael Hausenblas' editorial comments (was Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1) (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: TERMorCURIEorAbsURIs definition problem (Sunday, 6 February)

Shelley Powers

• Re: Last Call response for ISSUE-71: LC Comments from Shelley Powers (Sunday, 6 February)

Steven Pemberton

• ISSUE-81: Specification Structure, Part 3. (Thursday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-80: Specification Structure, Part 2. (Thursday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-79: Specification Structure, Part 1. (Thursday, 24 February)

Toby Inkster

• Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 (Sunday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: RDFa Default Profile Management (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) (Friday, 4 February)
• Fw: ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Friday, 4 February)
• Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Golly gosh! (Wednesday, 2 February)

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 22:14:24 UTC