- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:13:55 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
On 02/28/11 13:07, Ivan Herman wrote: > Just for my understanding: what this means is that what I said > remains true at least for XHTML: > > - the XHTML default profile does not (necessarily) include the > content of the RDFa+XML default profile - in the case of XHTML, an > implementation has to load both of them (conceptually) and has to > reconcile the prefixes and terms. Correct. > The difference you seem to stress is that a particular host language > has the possibility to declare that it does _not_ want to get the > RDFa+XML default profile to be loaded prior to its own profile. Yes. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 22:14:24 UTC