W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:33:54 +0100
To: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Message-Id: <D6C7F9AC-E2C8-47E7-8FCD-B2C4D5AA6011@w3.org>

I have not received any comment, neither pro or con, on the processor graph vocabulary mails:

- The proposal for a vocabulary[1] and putting it into the document[2]
- Whether it is indeed necessary to make a change on the document in view of what is there[3]

I would like to discharge these actions. If I see no objection to [1][2], I will do that early next week. Toby, it would be great if you commented on [3] to see if any action is needed on that one at all...



[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Processor_Graph_Vocabulary
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Feb/0007.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Feb/0006.html

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 10:33:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:23 UTC