- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:33:54 +0100
- To: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 10:33:35 UTC
Guys, I have not received any comment, neither pro or con, on the processor graph vocabulary mails: - The proposal for a vocabulary[1] and putting it into the document[2] - Whether it is indeed necessary to make a change on the document in view of what is there[3] I would like to discharge these actions. If I see no objection to [1][2], I will do that early next week. Toby, it would be great if you commented on [3] to see if any action is needed on that one at all... Thanks! Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Processor_Graph_Vocabulary [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Feb/0007.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Feb/0006.html ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 10:33:35 UTC