Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 )

Thanks Toby.

Shane, I have made the changes. This action is hereby closed...

Ivan

On Feb 4, 2011, at 16:40 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:45 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Section 4.1 now says:
>> ---------------------
>> "The processor graph term is used to denote the collection of all
>> informational, warning, and error triples that are generated by the
>> RDFa Processor as a result of processing the document."
>> ->
>> "The processor graph term is used to denote the collection of all
>> informational, warning, and error triples that may used by the RDFa
>> Processor to <a href="#processor-status">report is status</a>."
> 
> Link text should be "report its status".
> 
>> Section 7.6
>> -----------
>> "The processor graph is designed as a mechanism to capture all
>> informational, warning, and error messages as triples from the RDFa
>> Processor. "
>> ->
>> "The processor graph is designed as an optional mechanism to capture
>> all informational, warning, and error messages as triples from the
>> RDFa Processor. "
>> 
>> If you agree with these changes I will commit the source and declare
>> victory on that one! 
> 
> Yep, sounds good to me.
> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf