- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:16:11 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:59 , Nathan wrote: > >> Ivan Herman wrote: >>> I would agree with this restriction. @profile values should indeed be absolute URI-s >>> ... >>> I would actually add the same restriction to @vocab. >> Ack we can't, @vocab needs to consider fragments, such as: >> >> <div vocab="http://example.org/foo#"> >> <p property="bar"> .. >> > > Isn't that an absolute URI? What I meant is that a @vocab="#me" would be a problem. I do not care, in this context, of a fragment in the URI... nope, URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] absolute-URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] relative-ref = relative-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ] URI-reference = URI / relative-ref http://example.org/vocab# == URI http://example.org/profile == absolute-URI #me == relative-ref and all are URI-reference(s). Thanks for asking, just realised I the text I've literally /just/ proposed needs further clarified with the above. Best, Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:18:02 UTC