- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:18:57 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > There may be one more additional feature we may want to add to the text, beyond what the TAG might give us: avoid using fragid-s in profile URI-s. That is the only URI that an RDFa processor will dereference, and two different URI-s differing by a fragid only will return the same graph. On the other hand, using two different URI-s for the same graph my make the local caching process inefficient (unless clients would strip the fragid part before caching but I would not expect them to do that...) Hmm, should we be clarifying the definition of @profile to accept a whitespace separated list of absolute-URIs (never relative, never with fragment) to avoid /some/ unexpected behaviour? * I say some, because people could still use "mailto:bob@example.org", but I figure we shouldn't cater for people who like to do things like that! Best, Nathan >>>> ISSUE-84
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 10:20:49 UTC