- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:40:13 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:34:54 +0000 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > I was just suggesting that we changed the value space of @profile to > be absolute-URI, because then regardless of whether somebody wrote > http://a.b.c/e or http://a.b.c/e#f or http://a.b.c/e#g in @profile, > it would always be seen as http://a.b.c/e . My suggestion: - consumers MUST support fragment identifiers in profile URIs (by simply trimming them off); and - publishers MUST NOT publish documents referring to profile URIs with fragment identifiers. This gives future RDFa Working Groups an extension point: they can assign meaning to a fragment ID on a profile. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 06:40:15 UTC