W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:59:07 +0000
Message-ID: <4D5121FB.7060304@webr3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote:
> I would agree with this restriction. @profile values should indeed be absolute URI-s
> ...
> I would actually add the same restriction to @vocab.

Ack we can't, @vocab needs to consider fragments, such as:

  <div vocab="http://example.org/foo#">
    <p property="bar"> ..

in order to form

Apologies, I missed that earlier - still absolute-URI could apply to 
@profile though.


Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:01:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:24 UTC