W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

prefixes for the default rdfa profile (related to ACTION-62 )

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:53:33 +0100
Message-Id: <B3ACBA54-251A-4BF9-A86C-B1AD6477A9AD@w3.org>
To: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I know that the idea was to put this on the wiki, but, eventually, these should be part of an RDFa file, so I did in html+rdfa instead (preempting Nathan...):


these are the automatic prefixes (I may have missed something). There are some namespaces that are not yet in a not or a recommendation, but close, so we can add them, too (eg, void and sparql).

That is the easy part. The question is whether we would add a start up set of prefixes and then start the formal registration process or whether we stop here, and rely on the registration process for the whole thing. I am tempted by the former if we can find some sort of a more objective measure of choice. Eg, I can try to contact the DERI people who maintain sindice or prefix.cc that may give us soem more objective measure...


Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 19:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:24 UTC