public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from August 2011 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2011

• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Souripriya Das

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> ashok malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Minutes of 2011-08-30 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> David McNeil
• Re: Minutes of 2011-08-30 telecon David McNeil
• Raising issues/actions for Souri's comments Richard Cyganiak
• Minutes of 2011-08-30 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) David McNeil
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61) Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) David McNeil
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC Nuno Lopes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas

Monday, 29 August 2011

• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) David McNeil
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatype handling added to R2RML spec (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-48, ISSUE-51) Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) David McNeil
• Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61) David McNeil

Sunday, 28 August 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak

Saturday, 27 August 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Remaining R2RML issues for Last Call (ISSUE-55, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Remaining R2RML issues for Last Call (ISSUE-55, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58) ashok malhotra
• Remaining R2RML issues for Last Call (ISSUE-55, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58) Richard Cyganiak
• Please review: syntactic sugar and polishing (ISSUE-54, ISSUE-56, ISSUE-59, ISSUE-60) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61) Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 26 August 2011

• Re: ISSUE-57: Ok to go to Last Call with this text? ashok malhotra
• Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec David McNeil
• ISSUE-57: Ok to go to Last Call with this text? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Process: ISSUE-61 (translation schemes) and ISSUE-49 (SQL terminology) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Datatype handling added to R2RML spec (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-48, ISSUE-51) Michael Hausenblas
• Process: ISSUE-61 (translation schemes) and ISSUE-49 (SQL terminology) Richard Cyganiak

Thursday, 25 August 2011

• Datatype handling added to R2RML spec (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-48, ISSUE-51) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak

Tuesday, 23 August 2011

• Proposal for ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: LC deadline ashok malhotra
• LC deadline Michael Hausenblas
• Minutes of 2011-08-23 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-23 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-23 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-23 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 22 August 2011

• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda

Friday, 19 August 2011

• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• More Comments on the Direct Mapping Specification Joerg Unbehauen

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

• Minutes of 2011-08-16 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 13 August 2011

• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-16 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 11 August 2011

• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Ivan Herman
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) ashok malhotra
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Michael Hausenblas

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Re: Direct Mapping Spec - Comments Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: Direct Mapping Spec - Comments Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Souripriya Das
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Direct Mapping Spec - Comments Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 David McNeil
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 David McNeil
• Re: Direct Mapping Spec - Comments David McNeil
• Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65 Juan Sequeda
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Direct Mapping Spec - Comments David McNeil
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) David McNeil
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Proposal for lookup tables in R2RML, based on SKOS Ivan Herman
• Re: Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Nuno Lopes
• Re: Proposal for lookup tables in R2RML, based on SKOS Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for lookup tables in R2RML, based on SKOS Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) ashok malhotra
• Datatypes (ISSUE-48) Richard Cyganiak
• Proposal for lookup tables in R2RML, based on SKOS Richard Cyganiak
• Minutes of 2011-08-09 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• ISSUE-65: For uniformity and performance, "literal" triples must be always generated for each child table column in a foreign key RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-64: Predicate IRI design for foreign key does not handle common cases where same column sequence may be used for multiple foreign key constraints [Direct Mapping] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROPOSAL for always creating literal triples for each of the columns that is included in a foreign key Juan Sequeda
• PROPOSAL for always creating literal triples for each of the columns that is included in a foreign key Souripriya Das
• Re: PROPOSAL for Direct Mapping predicate IRI design for foreign-key Marcelo Arenas
• PROPOSAL for Direct Mapping predicate IRI design for foreign-key Souripriya Das
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-09 meeting 1600 UTC ashok malhotra
• Re: Comments and suggestions regarding the 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF' Richard Cyganiak
• Comments and suggestions regarding the 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF' Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Ivan Herman

Monday, 8 August 2011

• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Ivan Herman
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Ivan Herman
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Michael Hausenblas
• Substantial comments on the DM Mapping Ivan Herman
• Editorial comments on DM draft Ivan Herman
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases reports Richard Cyganiak

Saturday, 6 August 2011

• Re: rdb2rdf test cases reports Nuno Lopes
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases reports Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Join the W3C Workshop on Data and Services Integration (Call for Participation) ashok malhotra
• Re: Join the W3C Workshop on Data and Services Integration (Call for Participation) Hausenblas, Michael
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-09 meeting 1600 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
• Fwd: Join the W3C Workshop on Data and Services Integration (Call for Participation) ashok malhotra
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases reports Michael Hausenblas

Friday, 5 August 2011

• rdb2rdf test cases reports Nuno Lopes
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 4 August 2011

• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call Ivan Herman
• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call David McNeil
• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call Ivan Herman
• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call David McNeil

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Why don't we have referencing subject/predicate/graph maps? Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-48 (was: Re: ACTION-141) Create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Status of the R2RML document and going last call Michael Hausenblas
• Status of the R2RML document and going last call Richard Cyganiak
• Minutes of 2011-08-02 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: ACTION-141 - Create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping Nuno Lopes
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-02 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Why don't we have referencing subject/predicate/graph maps? Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-02 meeting 1600 UTC ashok malhotra
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ISSUE-63 (dm-english): Normative expression of the Direct Mapping in Plain English [Direct Mapping] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 1 August 2011

• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Why don't we have referencing subject/predicate/graph maps? David McNeil
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Ivan Herman

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:37:46 UTC