W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61)

From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:48:25 -0400
Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B1C571F9-637C-4D35-94E7-8C89ED2E634D@openlinksw.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>

On Aug 23, 2011, at 01:08 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Due to popular request, re-sending this message with updated
> subject line :-P


It looks good to me, particularly after David's comments were 

I think the SKOS approach is the right choice, and that broadMatch
is appropriate for the 1:N scenario.



A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:49:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC