- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:16:10 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: "public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org RDB2RDF" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> I've set ISSUE-61 to PENDING REVIEW as I believe it to be addressed > in the current spec, as described here (and discussed in this week's > call): > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/ > 0133.html > Yup, I (still) agree ;) > I've set ISSUE-49 to POSTPONED because it's no longer feasible given > the remaining time, and no one besides me has expressed interest in > it anyways. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/49 Thanks. +1 Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 26 Aug 2011, at 01:39, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > I've set ISSUE-61 to PENDING REVIEW as I believe it to be addressed > in the current spec, as described here (and discussed in this week's > call): > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/ > 0133.html > > I've set ISSUE-49 to POSTPONED because it's no longer feasible given > the remaining time, and no one besides me has expressed interest in > it anyways. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/49
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 05:16:38 UTC