W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Addressing ISSUE-64 and ISSUE-65

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:55:58 +0100
Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <ED7C0765-00E8-4C12-9597-253702AD6EBF@cyganiak.de>
To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
On 10 Aug 2011, at 19:34, David McNeil wrote:
> > Souri, all: what are the cons of having the constraint name in the IRI?
> It can be a generated identifier which can be painful to look at,

Human-generated identifiers can be painful to look at too. I wouldn't consider this a problem.

> and not-deterministic (i.e. it is not a function of the DDL).

Good point. Yes, that *is* a problem to some extent. It makes writing test cases for the DM  impossible unless you explicitly specify the constraint names in the DDL.

Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 18:56:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC