Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term>

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Richard Cyganiak <>wrote:

> I take it that you mean to propose to drop the use of SKOS mapping
> properties?


> This would lead to almost no simplification in the spec or in
> implementations. It would simply mean dropping the innermost #3 item in the
> algorithm [1]. (Plus changing the example, and tweaking the section intro
> text and the way duplicate notations are detected.)

This would simplify the spec, implementations, and the syntax for doing 1:N

What is the argument for keeping the SKOS mapping properties?


Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:54:59 UTC