Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-02 meeting 1600 UTC

Dear All,

Regrets for today (in a meeting).

All the best,

Marcelo

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Michael Hausenblas
<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please find below the agenda for next week's call.
>
>
> Cheers,
>        Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-08-02
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=02&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Chair: Michael
>
>
> 1. Admin
>
> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
> http://www.w3.org/2011/07/26-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>
>
>
> 2. SQL/XSD data dataype mapping
>
> ACTION-141 Nuno to create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping in the Wiki until
> next week
>
> DONE, with
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Mapping_SQL_datatypes_to_XML_Schema_datatypes
>
>
>
> 3. ISSUE-29 - resource identifiers as strings
>
> ACTION-124 Seema to implement decision re ISSUE-29 (bNodes identifier and
> URI expressions be of string types)
>
>
> ... which has been superseded by ...
>
>
> ACTION-147: Richard to implement ISSUE-29 resolution by stating that
> conversion to string is done implicitly in any context where a string value
> is required, and is done according to the rules for SQL's CAST expression.
> Columns whose type cannot be CAST to string MUST NOT be used in a context
> that requires a string; and mark the issue as pending review
>
>
>
> 4. Actions
>
>
> ACTION-137 Souri to create proposal for IRIs to resolve ISSUE-45
>
> ACTION-139 Boris to move the R2RML extended examples from the specification
> to the Test Cases document - ISSUE 52
>
> ACTION-140 Boris to produce an RDF Schema representation of the R2RML
> vocabulary terms
>
>
>
> 5. Issues without actions or unclear who is on it
>
>
> ISSUE-54 simpler constant-valued term maps
>
> ISSUE-57 R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax
>
> ISSUE-58 R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough
>
> ISSUE-59 Syntactic sugar for triples maps that only have a single
> predicate-object map
>
> ISSUE-60 Syntactic sugar for the simple case of logical tables
>
> ISSUE-61 Re-using public entity identifiers - look-up table
>
>
>
> 6. RDB2RDF Test Cases status (Boris)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/
>
>
>
> 7. AOB
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 16:03:17 UTC