Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> from Souripriya Das on 2011-08-30 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from August 2011)

From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:40:09 -0400
To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
CC: RDB2RDF Working Group WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4E5D4AA9.1080409@oracle.com>

David,

Here is the URL [1].

I have sent some text in the previous email [2], but here it is, just in 
case:

[] rr:column "cuisine";
    rr:translationScheme <#db-cuisines>.

 <http://chef.example.com/cuisines> rr:valueMap 
   [ rr:value "1" ; 
     rr:term <http://chef.example.com/cuisines/asian>
   ] ,

   [ rr:value "2" ; 
     rr:term <http://chef.example.com/cuisines/asian>
   ] ,

   [ rr:value "3" ;
     rr:term <http://chef.example.com/cuisines/italian>
   ] .

Thanks,
- Souri.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-associated-translation-scheme
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0197.html

David McNeil wrote:
> Is it possible to send to the mailing list the text (or a link to the 
> text) for the alternate solution proposed by Souri?
>
> -David

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 20:42:07 UTC