W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC

From: Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+7aXj4YMSzmFH67OOjkwe9hZk1NgdJ1VAFejc=W6E66pF+P8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Dear All,

Regrets for today (in a conference).

Yesterday we discussed with Juan about the direct mapping pending
issues, so he will be my representative in the conference call :-)

All the best,

Marcelo


On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Michael Hausenblas
<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please find below the agenda for our tomorrow's conference call.
>
>
> Cheers,
>        Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-08-30
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=30&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Chair: Michael
> Scribe: Michael
>
>
>
> 1. Admin
>
> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
> http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>
>
> 2. Postpone LC deadline
>
> Discussion from last time and
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0135.html
>
>
> 3. R2RML
>
> ISSUE-61 PENDING REVIEW see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0133.html
>
> ACTION-147 on Richard re ISSUE-29:
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-29; all places that interpret SQL values as string now
> use "conversion to string"
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
> ]]
>
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-51; the spec now demands that “supported RDF types”
> MUST raise data error, and other types MAY raise data error
> ]]
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Lack of consensus on the syntax question is noted in the issue box
> in Section 4.2, which presents both options. A decision on the question will
> be postponed until after Last Call. This closes ISSUE-57.
> ]]
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUES 54, 56, 59, 60; they are addressed in the latest
> draft.
> ]]
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0150.html
> for details re  ISSUES 54, 56, 59, and 60.
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
> ]]
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can be
> addressed after Last Call
> ]]
>
>
> 4. DM
> ISSUE-65 ... do we have a PROPOSAL for this? if yes, please reply here, dear
> DM Editors
>
>
> 5. AOB
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 14:58:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC