W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Remaining R2RML issues for Last Call (ISSUE-55, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58)

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:40:03 +0100
Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <DA068D8D-6F88-42C8-9870-77EABAEB0D5A@deri.org>
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com

> Thank you, Richard!  That's great progress.

+1 .. this is indeed very good news  - now hoping to hear the same  
soon from the DM Editors? ;)

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 27 Aug 2011, at 17:46, ashok malhotra wrote:

> Thank you, Richard!  That's great progress.
> All the best, Ashok
>
> On 8/27/2011 9:10 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> Three R2RML issues are still OPEN:
>>
>> ISSUE-55: Nested predicate-object maps
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/55
>>
>> [[
>> PROPSOAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
>> ]]
>>
>>
>> ISSUE-57: R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/57
>>
>> As I said in another thread, there's text in the spec acknowledging  
>> the lack of consensus, and if Oracle is ok with the text then  
>> ISSUE-57 is not a blocker for Last Call.
>>
>>
>> ISSUE-58: R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/58
>>
>> [[
>> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and  
>> can be addressed after Last Call
>> ]]
>>
>>
>> Fourteen further issues are PENDING REVIEW. I am fine with closing  
>> them all, but we'll have to see what everyone thinks after  
>> reviewing them:
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/pendingreview
>>
>>
>> In my opinion, this makes the R2RML spec ready for Last Call.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>
Received on Saturday, 27 August 2011 18:40:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC