W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Remaining R2RML issues for Last Call (ISSUE-55, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58)

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:46:46 -0700
Message-ID: <4E591F76.70508@oracle.com>
To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Thank you, Richard!  That's great progress.
All the best, Ashok

On 8/27/2011 9:10 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Three R2RML issues are still OPEN:
>
> ISSUE-55: Nested predicate-object maps
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/55
>
> [[
> PROPSOAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
> ]]
>
>
> ISSUE-57: R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/57
>
> As I said in another thread, there's text in the spec acknowledging the lack of consensus, and if Oracle is ok with the text then ISSUE-57 is not a blocker for Last Call.
>
>
> ISSUE-58: R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/58
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can be addressed after Last Call
> ]]
>
>
> Fourteen further issues are PENDING REVIEW. I am fine with closing them all, but we'll have to see what everyone thinks after reviewing them:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/pendingreview
>
>
> In my opinion, this makes the R2RML spec ready for Last Call.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Received on Saturday, 27 August 2011 16:48:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC