Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping

Hi Ivan,

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I would like to have a fair assessment of the work involved. There is, clearly, a disagreement on this at this moment: Juan (and maybe you) think that the rewrite is simple, ie, a matter of a few hours, mostly pushing existing texts around. Eric does not seem to think so: I have the feeling that his assessment is a much more substantial editing work compared to the existing draft.
>
> I would also note that, at least in
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/#rules
>
> there are still a number of 'To do...' items. Obviously, any editing should finalize these for LC. These to do-s have been around for a while now, so we would also need a clear deadline on when these things are completed.

We just uploaded a new version of the document with a complete version
of Section 4:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/

The "to-do" items in the previous document were missing examples,
which are included in this new version.

All the best,

Marcelo

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 12:54:34 UTC