public-owl-wg@w3.org from June 2008 by date

Monday, 30 June 2008

• Re: Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Issue-114 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-114 Rinke Hoekstra
• Issue-114 Alan Ruttenberg
• First draft of Traceability Requirements Matrix (Action 153) Kashyap, Vipul
• [UFDTF] A start on a draft for the OWL2 Requirements document Evan Wallace

Sunday, 29 June 2008

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 26 June 2008

• Re: intendedProfile (ISSUE-111) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Bijan Parsia
• Resolution of ISSUE-21 and ISSUE-24 (ACTION-163) Boris Motik
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Ian Horrocks
• RE: intendedProfile Boris Motik
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Ivan Herman
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jos de Bruijn
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Bijan Parsia
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Bijan Parsia
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 25 June 2008

• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Alan Ruttenberg
• RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) Boris Motik
• Re: This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-108: naming of profiles Carsten Lutz
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jie Bao
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 24 June 2008

• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) Michael Schneider
• owl:intendedProfile Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-131 (Single OWL-R profile): We should unify OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full profiles OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• Agenda TC 25/06/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) Boris Motik

Friday, 20 June 2008

• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 19 June 2008

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Evan Wallace
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Michael Smith
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Boris Motik
• Re: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 18 June 2008

• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited Boris Motik
• Re: Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: scribing in the new regime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: scribing in the new regime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• scribing in the new regime Sandro Hawke
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jie Bao
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Interesting post related to the GRDDL issue Bijan Parsia
• ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 17 June 2008

• Re: Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? Ian Horrocks
• Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: N-ary Data Predicates Kendall Grant Clark
• N-ary Data Predicates Bijan Parsia
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Top object and data properties added (as part of my open ACTION-160) Rinke Hoekstra

Monday, 16 June 2008

• Re: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) Bijan Parsia
• I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) Boris Motik
• Top object and data properties added (as part of my open ACTION-160) Boris Motik
• I have updated the RDF mapping according to Michael's comments Boris Motik

Friday, 13 June 2008

• Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Minutes Jun 11 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: Minutes Jun 11 2008 Alan Ruttenberg
• Minutes Jun 11 2008 Markus Krötzsch
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu

Thursday, 12 June 2008

• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Bijan Parsia
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Boris Motik
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 11 June 2008

• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Michael Schneider
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Boris Motik
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Michael Schneider
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Bijan Parsia
• One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] Alan Wu
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Ivan Herman
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Ivan Herman
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Bijan Parsia
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Ivan Herman
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Ivan Herman
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Conrad Bock
• A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) Boris Motik

Tuesday, 10 June 2008

• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 Bijan Parsia
• RE: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 Michael Schneider
• Re: Issue-111 another angle and questions Bijan Parsia
• Agenda for teleconference 2008.06.11 Ian Horrocks
• Re: [UFDTF] records for UFDTF telecons from 2 June and today are available Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] Alan Ruttenberg
• ACTION-147: Review of the RDF mapping Michael Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] Boris Motik
• ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] Michael Schneider

Monday, 9 June 2008

• [UFDTF] records for UFDTF telecons from 2 June and today are available Evan Wallace
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Michael Schneider
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Ivan Herman
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Ivan Herman
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 8 June 2008

• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Kashyap, Vipul
• I have changed the spec to follow the W3C's style manual regarding the usage of SHOULD and SHOULD NOT Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Boris Motik

Saturday, 7 June 2008

• ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL Michael Schneider
• Re: rdf:Property, reverse mapping, backwards compatibility Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Alan Ruttenberg
• rdf:Property, reverse mapping, backwards compatibility Alan Ruttenberg
• Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 Kashyap, Vipul

Friday, 6 June 2008

• Annotation of axioms Alan Rector

Thursday, 5 June 2008

• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 4 June 2008

• ISSUE-130 (confwarn): Conformance, warnings, errors OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• proposal to close ISSUE-127 (narynotyet) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary Michael Schneider
• Documenting "interesting" equivalences Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary Boris Motik
• RE: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 3 June 2008

• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary Michael Schneider
• Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: For namespace reuse Bijan Parsia
• Re: For namespace reuse Ivan Herman
• Re: For namespace reuse Bijan Parsia
• Re: For namespace reuse Ivan Herman
• For namespace reuse Bijan Parsia

Monday, 2 June 2008

• Potential performance problems with easy keys Boris Motik
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Bijan Parsia
• Minutes 28/05/2008 Alan Wu
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property Boris Motik
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Bijan Parsia
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property Michael Schneider
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Ivan Herman
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Ivan Herman

Sunday, 1 June 2008

• RE: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange Michael Schneider
• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) Elisa F. Kendall
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property Boris Motik
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Alan Ruttenberg

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2008 22:21:12 UTC