Re: rdf:Property, reverse mapping, backwards compatibility

Same issue re: rdfs:Class.
On Jun 7, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> The reverse mapping only removes rdf:Property triples in the  
> presence of another property typing triple - a declaration, in the  
> same graph. This leads to a situation in which an OWL 1 ontology  
> which has x rdf:type rdf:property, and  x rdf:type  
> owl:ObjectProperty in the imports closure, valid in OWL 1, would be  
> considered syntactically invalid in OWL 2.
> The repair, I believe,  is to remove those rows that mention  
> rdf:Property  the reverse mapping in table 4 and simply say that  
> all triples x rdf:type rdf:Propery  are deleted.
> -Alan

Received on Saturday, 7 June 2008 13:40:29 UTC