- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:39:51 -0400
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Same issue re: rdfs:Class. -Alan On Jun 7, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > The reverse mapping only removes rdf:Property triples in the > presence of another property typing triple - a declaration, in the > same graph. This leads to a situation in which an OWL 1 ontology > which has x rdf:type rdf:property, and x rdf:type > owl:ObjectProperty in the imports closure, valid in OWL 1, would be > considered syntactically invalid in OWL 2. > > The repair, I believe, is to remove those rows that mention > rdf:Property the reverse mapping in table 4 and simply say that > all triples x rdf:type rdf:Propery are deleted. > > -Alan >
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2008 13:40:29 UTC