RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary)


 > In general, I strongly support putting all of built-in vocabulary
 > "off limits" in OWL 2, without any exceptions.

Do you mean for OWL 2 DL or all of OWL 2?

My concern is existing tools successfully reason with subclasses of
owl:Class and I believe with subclasses of properties also (this was
discussed on the list a while back).  This capability is critical to
specifying domain specific languages, and metamodeling in general.
Would your proposal mean these tools are not OWL 2 compliant?


Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:09:15 UTC