From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> Subject: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:02:57 +0200 > [cc'ed Jeremy, since he brought this point up at last telco] > [slightly related to ISSUE-124, but should be regarded as distinct > issue] > > Note: This mail serves as a base for the discussion in this week's > telco. > According to the agenda, we will discuss: > > [[ > Issue 124: > [...] > Michael's concern: Why not relative to whole domain > - including individials? > ]] > > (Just to be clear: I did not suggest to extend the complements > of dataranges to the "whole" domain in OWL DL. This would > make no sense. I only stated that in *OWL Full* the complement > actually *is* relative to the whole domain, and that this > difference between DL and Full may lead to problems. > I write this mail here to show such a problem.) I don't see that the situation in OWL Full is forced. The complement operator for dataranges could, I think, be relative to rdfs:Literal in OWL Full. peterReceived on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:15:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:47 UTC