Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81]

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:55:04 -0400 (EDT)
• To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
• Cc: alan.wu@oracle.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20080611.125504.165457843.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:29:55 -0400

> On Jun 11, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Alan Wu wrote:
> 
> >> Generating (s p o) may seem redundant. However, it makes
> implementation a lot easier. 
> 
> It's not really redundant. If the (s p o) is legitimately there, then
> it has to be stated, as the RDF semantics don't imply (s p o) from the
> reified version. 

Ahh, but we are not in (just) RDF.

> -Alan

peter

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:56:50 UTC