public-owl-wg@w3.org from June 2008 by author

Alan Rector

• Annotation of axioms (Friday, 6 June)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Sunday, 29 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: Minutes Jun 11 2008 (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Sunday, 8 June)
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Sunday, 8 June)
• Re: rdf:Property, reverse mapping, backwards compatibility (Saturday, 7 June)
• Re: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Saturday, 7 June)
• rdf:Property, reverse mapping, backwards compatibility (Saturday, 7 June)
• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Sunday, 1 June)

Alan Wu

• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Minutes 28/05/2008 (Monday, 2 June)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• Interesting post related to the GRDDL issue (Wednesday, 18 June)
• N-ary Data Predicates (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) (Monday, 16 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Thursday, 12 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: Issue-111 another angle and questions (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Documenting "interesting" equivalences (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: For namespace reuse (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: For namespace reuse (Tuesday, 3 June)
• For namespace reuse (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)

Boris Motik

• Resolution of ISSUE-21 and ISSUE-24 (ACTION-163) (Thursday, 26 June)
• RE: intendedProfile (Thursday, 26 June)
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (Wednesday, 25 June)
• RE: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (Tuesday, 24 June)
• RE: I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) (Thursday, 19 June)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Wednesday, 18 June)
• I've extended the specification with easy keys (ACTION-160) (Monday, 16 June)
• Top object and data properties added (as part of my open ACTION-160) (Monday, 16 June)
• I have updated the RDF mapping according to Michael's comments (Monday, 16 June)
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Thursday, 12 June)
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 11 June)
• A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• RE: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] (Tuesday, 10 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Monday, 9 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Monday, 9 June)
• I have changed the spec to follow the W3C's style manual regarding the usage of SHOULD and SHOULD NOT (Sunday, 8 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Sunday, 8 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Potential performance problems with easy keys (Monday, 2 June)
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Sunday, 1 June)

Carsten Lutz

• ISSUE-108: naming of profiles (Wednesday, 25 June)

Conrad Bock

• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) (Sunday, 1 June)

Elisa F. Kendall

• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) (Sunday, 1 June)

Evan Wallace

• [UFDTF] A start on a draft for the OWL2 Requirements document (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• [UFDTF] records for UFDTF telecons from 2 June and today are available (Monday, 9 June)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda TC 25/06/2008 (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 (Tuesday, 17 June)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: Minutes Jun 11 2008 (Friday, 13 June)
• Agenda for teleconference 2008.06.11 (Tuesday, 10 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Monday, 9 June)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: For namespace reuse (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: For namespace reuse (Tuesday, 3 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)

Jie Bao

• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Wednesday, 18 June)

Jos de Bruijn

• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Thursday, 26 June)

Kashyap, Vipul

• First draft of Traceability Requirements Matrix (Action 153) (Monday, 30 June)
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Monday, 9 June)
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Sunday, 8 June)
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Sunday, 8 June)
• RE: Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Sunday, 8 June)
• Representation of Negative Assertions in OWL 1.0 (Saturday, 7 June)

Kendall Grant Clark

• Re: N-ary Data Predicates (Tuesday, 17 June)

Markus Krötzsch

• Minutes Jun 11 2008 (Friday, 13 June)

Michael Schneider

• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 (reification in netagive property assertions) (Tuesday, 24 June)
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Thursday, 12 June)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 11 June)
• RE: A proposal for ISSUE-104 (built-in vocabulary) (Wednesday, 11 June)
• RE: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 (Tuesday, 10 June)
• ACTION-147: Review of the RDF mapping (Tuesday, 10 June)
• ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship] (Tuesday, 10 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Monday, 9 June)
• ISSUE-104: The non-disallowed vocabulary in OWL 1 DL (Saturday, 7 June)
• RE: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Thursday, 5 June)
• RE: ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary (Wednesday, 4 June)
• RE: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Wednesday, 4 June)
• RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Tuesday, 3 June)
• ISSUE-104: Several issues with the current treatment of disallowed vocabulary (Tuesday, 3 June)
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)
• RE: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange (Sunday, 1 June)

Michael Smith

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Thursday, 19 June)

OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-131 (Single OWL-R profile): We should unify OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full profiles (Tuesday, 24 June)
• ISSUE-130 (confwarn): Conformance, warnings, errors (Wednesday, 4 June)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Thursday, 26 June)
• Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 25 June)
• RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: This may be relevant to both owl/xml issues: Issue-97 and Issue-109 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: Final Agenda for TC 25/06/2008 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Tuesday, 24 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Friday, 20 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Thursday, 19 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: Agenda for TC 18/06/2008 (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: scribing in the new regime (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: scribing in the new regime (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: ISSUE-24, ISSUE-21: Versioning language (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: One comment on RDF mapping [related to ISSUE 67 and ISSUE 81] (Wednesday, 11 June)
• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Thursday, 5 June)
• proposal to close ISSUE-127 (narynotyet) (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship (Tuesday, 3 June)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Issue-114 (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Re: Top object and data properties added (as part of my open ACTION-160) (Tuesday, 17 June)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-06-04 (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Monday, 2 June)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: intendedProfile (ISSUE-111) (Thursday, 26 June)
• owl:intendedProfile (Tuesday, 24 June)
• scribing in the new regime (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Minutes (11 Jun, 4 Jun, UFDTF) (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: [UFDTF] records for UFDTF telecons from 2 June and today are available (Tuesday, 10 June)
• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Tuesday, 3 June)

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2008 22:21:12 UTC