Saturday, 29 December 2012
- RE: HTML 5.1, Citations, Quotations, References, and Footnotes
- Time-Based Multimedia and Hypertext Documents
- HTML and Multimedia Synchronization
Wednesday, 26 December 2012
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- HTML 5.1, Citations, Quotations, References, and Footnotes
- RE: HTML 5.1, Web Cryptography API
Sunday, 23 December 2012
Saturday, 22 December 2012
- RE: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- RE: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- RE: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- RE: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- Re: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- RE: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- Re: United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
- United Nations WCIT ITU Conference and Scientific Forums
Friday, 21 December 2012
Thursday, 20 December 2012
- Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- RE: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation
- Reorganised test suite
- Preference Survey Re: HTML Microdata: Note vs Recommendation Track - Call for Rationale Statements
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- RE: HTML 5.1, Web Cryptography API
- RE: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- RE: HTML 5.1, Web Cryptography API
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
Monday, 17 December 2012
- Re: Patches merged or staged for week 50
- RE: HTML 5.1, Web Cryptography API
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- Call for Exclusions: HTML 5.1, main element, HTML Canvas 2D Context (Level 2)
- Re: HTML 5.1 Use Cases
Sunday, 16 December 2012
Saturday, 15 December 2012
Friday, 14 December 2012
- Re: TAG Decision on Rescinding the request to the HTML WG to develop a polyglot guide
- TAG Decision on Rescinding the request to the HTML WG to develop a polyglot guide
- Re: Call for Consensus on resolutions to Objections to Publish an FPWD for long textual descriptions on images - due Friday 20th December, 23:59 EST
- HTML 5.1, Web Cryptography API
- RE: Call for Consensus on resolutions to Objections to Publish an FPWD for long textual descriptions on images - due Friday 20th December, 23:59 EST
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
- Extension Specification Authoring & Publication
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- Re: Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
- Proposal: Polyglot validation in degrees - not boolean
- HTML 5.1, Speech and Handwriting Recognition
- Re: Microdata REC rationale statement discussion
Monday, 10 December 2012
Saturday, 8 December 2012
- Some HTML 5.1 Discussion Topics
- HTML 5.1 Use Cases
- Re: Patches merged or staged for week 50
- Re: Editorial patches staged for merge week 49
- Re: Patches merged or staged for week 50
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
Friday, 7 December 2012
- Re: HTML Microdata: Note vs Recommendation Track - Call for Rationale Statements
- RE: Patches merged or staged for week 50
- Patches merged or staged for week 50
- Re: Editorial patches staged for merge week 49
- Re: Editorial patches staged for merge week 49
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: Editorial patches staged for merge week 49
- Re: WHATWG patches staged for merge week 47 & update on branches
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
- Re: Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- Re: HTML Microdata: Note vs Recommendation Track - Call for Rationale Statements
- Questions about the video element
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- [srcset] issues with the srcset spec's boilerplate (was Re: Drafts by branch)
- Re: The missing Sentence tag
- The missing Sentence tag
- Re: Drafts by branch
- Re: Drafts by branch
- Drafts by branch
- Technical concerns about the addition of <main> to HTML
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
- A New Feature for Blogging Platforms
- [Bug 20239] New: Context Menu API for browsers (4 canvas-app)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation
Monday, 3 December 2012
- Microdata CR Objection Rationale Statement
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)
- [Bug 20201] New: polyglot markup and extensions via <script> (and <style>)
- [Bug 20199] New: HTML parser in toolchain vs polyglot: Say that such an HTML parser may produce polyglots
- [Bug 20198] New: Formally define that polyglot can be extended
- [Bug 20197] New: Formally define polyglot’s relationship to HTML5 ("applicable spec")