- From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 20 Dec 2012 12:18:56 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Cc: "Lin Clark" <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
I just tried the two different RDF distillers with the RDFa example
pointed to by Lin Clark.
One result was this:
---
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
<> dc:subject [ rdfs:label </plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1>;
skos:prefLabel </plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1> ] .
</plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1> a skos:Concept .
---
The other one was that:
---
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
<> dc:subject [ rdfs:label </plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1>;
skos:prefLabel </plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1>] .
</plain/?q=taxonomy/term/1> a skos:Concept .
---
For me that is the same, because the unused prefix rdf does not count.
The Drupal issue mentioned (http://drupal.org/node/1848464) also was
resolved one day after Lin Clark sent the mail.
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Lin Clark on November 28, 2012, wrote:
> For example,
> if you parse this test
> page<http://lin-clark.com/sites/default/files/md-candidaterec-rdfasnippet.html>with
> RDF
> distiller <http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller> (written by the new RDFa
> Test Suite author) vs the W3C's distiller
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa>(written by one of the RDFa 1.1
> editors), you get different results. This
> isn't a theoretical issue, it's an actual issue posted last
> week<http://drupal.org/node/1848464>to the Drupal.org issue queue.
> This puts a strain on data publishers and
> the tool authors (like me) who support them.
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 14:04:51 UTC