Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup (Was: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative)

FYI, I have now filed 4 bugs against Polyglot Markup, to address some 
of the issues that the XML/HTML TF discussed:

A) Formally define polyglot’s relationship to HTML5
   ("applicable spec")

B) Formally define that polyglot can be extended

C) HTML parser in toolchain vs polyglot: 
   Say that such an HTML parser may produce polyglots

D) polyglot markup and extensions via <script> (and <style>)

Leif Halvard Silli

Noah Mendelsohn, Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:57:03 -0500:
> On 12/1/2012 3:50 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Probably that line of thought should also be applied to Henri's
>> arguments since he only, this laid expressed that he wanted the said
>> consequences to be drawn from the report.
> I'm sure we'll try and do our best to come to whatever is the best 
> conclusion for the community, independent of when people's opinions 
> were expressed. I was only pointing out that there are some 
> challenges in trying to do in 2 weeks a careful reconsideration of 
> conclusions that were reached over many months, and with the benefit 
> of substantial review and input at the time. We'll do our best.
> Thank you!
> Noah

Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 06:55:51 UTC