Re: HTML/XML TF Report glosses over Polyglot Markup

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Sam Ruby <> wrote:
> If three people want to get together and collaborate, should the fact that
> some (and indeed many) may not want to participate be ground for stopping
> them?

I think it’s fine for 3 people to participate and create a coding
style for their blogs[1] that suits their use of non-conforming
parsers and publish the coding style on their blogs. Publishing such a
house style as a W3C REC will generate another decade of like the infamous Appendix C did for the previous

[1] together with suggest
the goals of the polyglot guide might morph as the goals of the coding
style on shift from catering to both to IE8 and
browsers that required XHTML for inline SVG (goal obsoleted by the
SVG-in-text/html capabilities of IE9 and of browser that have
HTML5-compliant parsers) to making the markup work in the
HTML5-incompliant *HTML* parser of libxml2. (It’s worth noting that
one could already use a compliant HTML parser to convert HTML to XHTML
and then use libxml2’s *XML* parser. For example, the
HTML Parser comes with a sample tool called .)

Henri Sivonen

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 14:30:09 UTC